Sunday, 31 May 2009
International Conference on the Future of Copyright-Bollywood represented
Monday, 25 May 2009
No freedom of expression for National Anthem
As per the reports, the Supreme Court disapproved of said song saying that nobody has the right to tinker with the National Anthem.The Bench said, “We have read it (the script of the song). It gives a total negative sense. It appears that every line of the national anthem has been proved wrong.”
The Court refused to grant any urgent legal relief to the director and told him to first approach the appellate tribunal, set up under the Cinematography Act, 1952 to challenge the board's decision and also asked the tribunal to decide on Varma's claim the board's decision within a month.
The director challenged the board's decision under Article 19(1) (a) of Constitution of India which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. He has claimed that the song is an independant body of work and merely uses the national anthem in a respectful manner for the purpose of artistic expression. It was also contended on his behalf that Board's decision made television channels and mobile service providers averse to the promos for the fear of insulting the National Anthem.
It would be interesting to see how Varma's artistic expression violates the restriction to freedom of speech under Article 19(2) and section5B of the Indian Cinematograph Act and undermines 'the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence' and also how it violates section 3 of Prevention of Insult to National Honour Act.
The moot question would be whether adaptation of the lyrics of National Anthem amount to 'distortion' and whether such adaptation amount to violation of 'public order, decency or morality'. Section 292 of Indian Penal Code defines "obscenity" as 'a book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation, figure or any other object, shall be deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to prurient interest or if its effect, or (where it comprises two or more distinct items) the effect of any one of its items, is if taken as a whole tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it'.
December, 1991 has by order issued guidelines to the Board [44 S.O. 836(E)] for the purpose of film certification:
"(a) The objectives of film certification will be to ensure that :
- the medium of film remains responsible and sensitive to the values and standards of society;
- artistic expression and creative freedoms are not unduly curbed.
(b) In pursuance of the above objectives, the Board of Film Certification shall ensure that:
-- Scenes -
(c) showing involvement of children in violence as victims or as perpetrators or as forced witness to violence, or showing children as being subjected to any form of child abuse;
-human sensibilities are not offended by vulgarity, obscenity or depravity;
- scenes degrading or denigrating women in any manner are not presented.
- Visuals or words contemptuous of social, religious or other groups are not presented.
- Visuals or words involving defamation of an individual or a body of individual or contempt of court are not presented.
(d) The Board of Film Certification shall ensure that the film :
- is judged in the entirety from the point of view of its overall impact; and
- is examined in the light of the period depicted in the film and the contemporary standards of the country and the people to which the film relates, provided that the film does not
deprave the morality of the audience."
It would be interesting to see how the balance between artistic expression and restriction to the same is maintained by the Appellate Board for Film certification.
Thursday, 14 May 2009
Copyright provisions for films
| Relevant Section | Provision |
Definition | 2 (f) 2 (y) | cinematograph film means any work of visual recording on any medium produced through a process from which a moving image may be produced by any means and includes a sound recording accompanying such visual recording and "cinematograph" shall be construed as including any work produced by any process analogous to cinematography including video films; "work" means any of the following works, namely:- (i) a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work; (ii) a cinematograph film |
Exclusions | | |
Dramatic work | 2 (h) | “dramatic work” includes any piece for recitation, choreographic work or entertainment in dumb show, the scenic arrangement or acting form of which is fixed in writing or otherwise but does not include a cinematograph film |
Photograph | 2 (s) | "photograph" includes photo-lithograph and any work produced by any process analogous to photography but does not include any part of a cinematograph film; |
Work in which Copyright subsist | 13 (1) (b) | copyright shall subsist throughout India in the following classes of works, that is to say, (a) original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works; (b) cinematograph films |
Work in which Copyright shall not subsist | 13(3) (a) |
|
Meaning of copyright for films | 14 (d) | For the purposes of this Act, "copyright" means the exclusive right subject to the provisions of this Act, to do or authorise the doing of any of the following acts in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof, namely In the case of cinematograph film, - (i) to make a copy of the film, including a photograph of any image forming part thereof; (ii) to sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire, any copy of the film, regardless of whether such copy has been sold or given on hire on earlier occasions; (iii) to communicate the film to the public; |
Ownership of Copyright in films | 17 read with 2 (d) (v) 2 (uu) | The author of a work shall be the "author' means … in relation to a cinematograph film the producer "producer', in relation to a cinematograph film or sound recording, means a person who takes the initiative and responsibility for making the work; |
Work on hire | 17 (b) 38 (4) | Cinematograph film made, for valuable consideration at the instance of any person, such person shall, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, be the first owner of the copyright therein. Once a performer has consented to the incorporation of his performance in a cinematograph film, the provisions of sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) shall have no further application to such performance. |
Term of copyright in cinematograph films. | 26 | In the case of a cinematograph film, copyright shall subsist until sixty years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the film is published. |
Films can be registered under the Copyright Act with the Indian Copyright office as per procedure set out here by paying a fee of Rs. 600 to the Copyright office.
Thursday, 7 May 2009
Title and Script Registration
Copyright infringement case
Ravi Chopra, CEO of B.R. Films, has opposed the case saying that they officially gained rights to make this film.
This case, if not settled out of Court, would be an important copyright case for the Bollywood, particularly on the aspect of 'substantial similarity' test to be decided in India. The list of Bollywood films "inspired" from Hollywood flicks are numerous, as listed in here.